找回密码
 注册
搜索
查看: 2310|回复: 7

关于减脂,最近看了个报告和大家分享下..

[复制链接]
poppejoe 发表于 2013-8-4 12:02 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
本帖最后由 poppejoe 于 2013-8-4 13:40 编辑 ) f) }! z- S5 I- P: w! C2 }
9 k: S$ v8 y, g( Q
报告是英文的.原版是% S; i% l( k6 D
Ask The Muscle Prof: What's The Best Cardio For Preserving Mass?
$ [! I  ]' U# z& _肌肉教授询问:什么有氧运动能维持肌肉的?
2 x: _6 C3 {1 K8 d1 Y) u+ |
/ i4 H( A0 H& b6 f
You've heard the benefits of high-intensity cardio for weight loss, but you're concerned it'll cost you hard-earned muscle. Learn the truth!5 p4 A% Y0 m# e% Z# D
' e6 n9 B/ X8 X, I! ?
你听说过的高强度的有氧减肥的好处,但你担心它会花费你辛苦挣来的肌肉。了解真相!
9 Z5 E3 P% d# X% G, t
/ r# o( D6 a& i5 F  H, l+ D
by Dr. Jacob Wilson Aug 01, 2013

  q7 y  \6 X, W* n! AQ
6 i$ I! z' Z( N: |1 CI hear people talking about high-intensity cardio constantly these days, but I still know a lot of guys who slog away for hours doing low-intensity work. I just want whichever one that won't cut into my gains! What should I do?
( L* T& n! I; a2 b5 L这些天我听到人们不断谈论高强度的有氧,但我还是知道了很多人还是会做低强度有氧。我只是想知道哪一种不影响我增肌!我应该怎么办?
2 E) T6 }) F& b- A* p0 K

4 x, C4 R0 G: d: [" U

One of the undeniable hallmarks of bodybuilding is extreme muscularity. The other is razor-sharp conditioning. Look at pretty much everybody's program, and you'll see how they approach these two goals: resistance training to build mass, followed by some cardio to burn fat. Simple enough, right?
* @" x5 d; U! ]% m4 _. f对于锻炼的人一个不可否认的就是要增肌,另外一个就是让自己塑形.在这点上大家都是认同的,你看到了别人在这两点上达到他们的目标:卖力的锻炼去增肌,一样的有氧去减脂. 我想够简单吧?
( Y/ R7 G! g! e4 |; [

The science backs up the effectiveness of these two modalities. It's where they mix, in "concurrent training," that things get complicated. For instance, a study published in theJournal of Applied Physiology in 1998 found that 10 weeks of resistance training plus cardio resulted in greater fat loss than lifting weights alone. Unfortunately, in that same study, strength gains were cut in half when cardio was added to weightlifting.1 Other studies have similarly found that muscle growth is severely decreased when cardio is integrated into a program.2,3

There are a number of explanations as to why cardio blunts gains. One is that cardio adds extra volume to your training, making it difficult to recover from normal lifting.4 Other researchers maintain that the physiological adaptations that follow cardio training are the complete opposite of those which occur with lifting weights, and that cardiovascular gains are thus capable of cancelling out gains from weight training.5

Both of these scenarios imply that mass-seekers are paddling upstream when they begin trying to cut fat. So is it really impossible to maximize the positive effects of cardio, while eliminating the negative? My colleagues at the University of Tampa and I have been studying this question in recent years, and we have some good news for you: It is possible. It all depends on what type of cardio you choose, and how much of it you perform.

这两种方式科学的有效性,当他们结合在一起"组合式训练"这样就会变得更复杂.例如,一份关于 Journal of Applied Physiology 在1998年发出的学术论文上表示 根据10周器械训练和有氧 单独做器械训练力量提升很大脂肪也减少.不幸的是 同样的研究中力量的同时加入有氧的增长反而减半. 1其他的研究也证明当有氧加入力量训练时 力量的增长会相对程度减少.2,3 这里有几种答案可以解释其中一点加入有氧相对增加了你在力量训练后的恢复.4 另外一个研究论在有氧完全抵消了力量训练.根据我和我的学生们的研究有好消息告诉你们,完全取决那种有氧和具体时间.
7 z0 h1 H( c. {, }; f3 M8 n
Pedal Away from the Treadmill ///
' N# J; E6 d( R; x6 m6 C6 I8 d

One of our recent studies investigated the effects that different types of cardio, their intensity, and the separation of cardio from lifting had on muscle size.6 The goal was to determine exactly which components of cardio are detrimental to resistance training results. For instance, when we compared cycling to running, we found that running caused far greater declines in muscle growth than cycling. This echoed a 2009 study in another lab which found that uphill walking produced greater decrements in strength than cycling.7

There are a couple of explanations for why this is the case. The first is that the range of motion you use when jogging or incline walking is so dissimilar from lifting weights—squatting, for instance—that it impairs strength gains in those lifts. Unlike running, however, cycling has a large range of motion at the knee and hips.

Another theory is that cycling is mainly a concentric movement and causes little muscle damage, whereas running causes a lot of muscle damage from its eccentric and elongation portions.8 This would make it easier to recover from cycling than from running.

The Importance of Intensity ///" |* b: x1 L  g

Intensity and duration have an even greater effect than mode. Our study concluded that long-term fat loss is actually lowest with moderate intensity, long-duration cardio. The greatest fat loss actually occurred with the shortest duration and highest-intensity activities, like sprinting. We also saw that the longer you do cardio per day, the greater the losses are in muscle mass. However, we found very small decreases in muscle and strength when cardio was kept to less than 20 minutes per day.

"But what about the 'fat-burning zone?'" you shout from the treadmill! By this, you refer to a study conducted in the early 1990s by Dr. Romijn, who concluded that we use the most fat during exercise when performing moderate intensity (65 percent heart rate max), long-duration (45-60 minutes) cardio.9 This study's conclusions are reflected in the "fat-burning" programs on nearly every cardio machine at the gym. However, a major problem with the study is that what happens during exercise does not always reflect what will occur long term. I want to hammer this point home.

My lab recently conducted another experiment where we compared low-intensity, long-duration cardio of 60 minutes with 4-10 sets of 10-30-second all-out sprints. As expected, we found that long duration cardio decreased muscle size. But get this: Sprinting actually increased size.10This suggests that sprinting can actually be anabolic and get you shredded at the same time!

Put it All Together ///) `+ @: m1 a" \- v7 B+ U9 C0 r

OK, I know many of you are thinking right now: "If this is true, then why do so many bodybuilders have success with long-duration, low-intensity cardio? It seems to work for them…" I reply that the question is not whether long-duration cardio can help you lose fat—it can—but rather what you as an athlete need to do in order to optimize your training and reach your goals as efficiently as possible. In this case, the research is clear: High-intensity sprinting leads to greater fat loss than low-intensity, while also maintaining and possibly increasing muscle mass.

That being said, sprinting isn't easy to get started with, so it's necessary to approach it methodically. Bodybuilders seeking fat loss should try performing 10-30 second all-out sprints for between 4 and 10 reps. When I say "all-out," I mean you should feel like you are going to puke at the end of the sprint. However, I recommend beginning at the lower range and working your way up.

Once you establish your conditioning, which will likely take at least a month, you should begin to periodize your sprinting protocols. For example, if you do three sprinting sessions per week, I recommend one to be shorter duration and really high intensity, such as six 10-second hill sprints. One could be moderate duration, such as six 15-second sprints on flat ground. And finally, one should be longer, such as four 30-second all-out cycling sprints. I'm also a fan of balls-to-wall activities like car pushes and prowler or sled pushes and pulls.

Finally, try to separate your cardio from leg days by at least a day. Our lab and others have found that the effects of cardio are specific to the muscle worked. So if you do leg-intensive cardio today, it will directly affect muscle growth in your legs. What research shows clearly is that cardio ideally should be separated from legs by at least 24 hours. Otherwise you risk impairing your gains.11

That may sound like a lot of guidelines, but just think about all the time you're saving by not spending hour after hour on the treadmill. It's definitely worth a little bit of extra planning.

% t; n7 h- p/ E

评分

参与人数 1金币 +2 收起 理由
jerry + 2 赞一个!

查看全部评分

 楼主| poppejoe 发表于 2013-8-4 12:10 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 poppejoe 于 2013-8-4 12:15 编辑
  y+ _, X  |2 R; S  u  @
. T7 b) \) v* ^: w$ W$ Z有空再慢慢翻译..
3 `7 m6 s  `+ R3 E9 O; u
回复

使用道具 举报

jerry 发表于 2013-8-4 12:57 | 显示全部楼层
楼主辛苦了,好文配图,亲手翻译

点评

实话..我也是走别人网站上面拿过来的只是我看 我们论坛里面好多人都是抱着跑步机死磕.所以想发出来让大家看看 我这些日子就是这样减脂的  发表于 2013-8-4 13:42
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| poppejoe 发表于 2013-8-4 13:08 | 显示全部楼层
我翻译不下去了. 具体几点提下..% ?; u; e+ b# t; |6 J0 t
1研究发现 长期以跑步方式减肥的人肌肉流失比较大 而用单车的则没那么大
% S8 n' I- _8 z3 E9 T* n2长时间跑步流失肌肉 但是冲刺或者爆发式反而增加肌肉,冲刺和爆发式运动同样可以达到一定心率起到减肥效果并且增加肌肉* x) G1 D/ z1 t* I

6 W, w9 Z9 Q7 }9 m差不多就这个意思..& R' P! d+ {' {7 n) M
基本上就是推崇 高强度于低强度的组合式有氧 不建议 长时间运动 每日的有氧最好不要超过20分钟 因为之前大家所熟悉的减肥区 也就是一致认同的运动20分钟后消耗完糖 开始消耗肥肉 会造成肌肉流失 但是减肥效果基本差不多4 F- Q5 W8 e- F* J. F
因为更加不同人体质和新陈代谢率饮食各方面来算 每日能用肥肉作为消耗能源基本上是有上限的如果超过这个上限的体重变化基本上就是消耗肌肉了
回复

使用道具 举报

agelit 发表于 2013-8-4 16:16 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
实在看不下去,感谢楼主以及楼上的翻译
回复

使用道具 举报

bujiyanjiu 发表于 2013-8-4 17:48 | 显示全部楼层
无氧间歇和高强度有氧间歇这两种运动方式都是不错的,本人正在实施,但是还要加以饮食方面的管理才能事半功倍。
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| poppejoe 发表于 2013-8-5 09:30 | 显示全部楼层
其实我一直主张的是平常一周不超过4-5次有氧 每次不超过25分钟 保持心率于65% 80% 我自己有买puma的心率表(强力推荐)其中加入1次高强度训练在我针对小肌肉群训练的那天 好比肩和腹肌
回复

使用道具 举报

lhb128 发表于 2013-8-5 16:07 | 显示全部楼层
鱼和熊掌不能皆得,减肥首选的,还是考虑performing moderate intensity (65 percent heart rate max), long-duration (45-60 minutes) cardio。
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|硬客健身

GMT+8, 2025-4-20 21:56

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2025 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表